1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the money ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding “the defendant’s affiliate” in the front of the “H police station” under Section 1-C(1) of the judgment of the court of first instance, and “the defendant’s affiliate of Chungcheongbuk-do” in the front of the “H police station” under Section 2-C(1) of the judgment of the court of first instance, and as such, it is cited in

2. Determination

A. The above facts are acknowledged as the occurrence of the right of indemnity, and the following circumstances, which can be acknowledged as having comprehensively taken into account the description or image of the evidence Nos. 2, 7-9, 13 through 15, 18, 20, 23, 39, and 6, namely, ① as a result of the autopsy on the Deceased, the Deceased’s face and head were shocked with the internal structure of the vehicle, caused considerable shock of the vehicle, and caused damage to the body, which eventually led to the death. However, the driver of the vehicle involved in the accident, who was the driver of the vehicle, stated that “the Deceased had a sound before and after the traffic accident in this case, 1, 7-9, 13 through 15, 18, 20, 23, 39, and 6, 3-2, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 39, 1, 3, 3, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, 3, 3, 1, 3, 1, see that “the deceased’s.