A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On September 5, 2017, around 11:00, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim E (the 67 years old) who divided the chest of the victim E (the 67 years old) into the elbbow on the roads in front of C High School located in Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon, and the leaflet against the amendment of the articles of incorporation of the D Union, thereby destroying the victim beyond the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness E, F, G, and H;

1. A witness I and each part of the court's own legal statements;

1. Some statements made against the defendant during the police interrogation protocol;

1. Complaint;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the mobile phone camera CD (the defendant and his defense counsel did not assault the victim at the time, and rather, the victim did not have any shock near the defendant.

The injured party consistently from the investigative agency to this court, and the accused changed the injured party's inducements into elbbow in the process of selling it.

statement is made.

Although the statements or written statements by E, F, G, H, I, J, and K were somewhat different from the detailed statements made by the Defendant at the time when the scene was observed near or near the scene at the time, the statements by the Defendant appear to go beyond the victim because the Defendant was pushed down with the victim under his/her arms (E, F, G, and H) and the statements by the victim (I, J, and K) are generally divided into: (i) the statement that the Defendant appeared to go beyond the victim even though there was no compromise between the Defendant and the victim’s rear.

Each of the above statements seems to have come into contact with the Defendant and the victim, and it seems that the victim took part in making a different statement according to his own opinion or his own opinion in the causes beyond the victim (it cannot be deemed that the victim took part in it according to the content of the field video as mentioned below). On the other hand, the Defendant has recorded his cell phone from around 10:54 p.m. on the day of the instant case to his own cell phone from around 10:54 p.m.