logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2017.06.14 2015고단4042
권리행사방해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has substantially operated a credit rating company E, a credit rating company F, a credit rating company G, H, etc., which can be leased to all age customers.

The Defendant, while practically operating the said siren car company under the name of I, J, K, etc., purchased a vehicle under the name of the said siren from the said borrower (a business operator who takes over a mortgage establishment vehicle at the market price of 40%) in comparison with that of the vehicle where the mortgage is not established, and used it as a vehicle that can be leased to all ages. On the increase in automobile insurance costs, the Defendant intentionally applied to the competent authority for the closure of the relevant siren, avoided the procedure for voluntarily cancelling the registration of the vehicle, and was subject to the disposition of ex officio cancellation of the said vehicle by the said authority, so that it is impossible for the mortgagee to exercise its rights by moving the vehicle into the name of another siren, use it as a siren continuously, and resell the vehicle that can be used as a siren for the general public, with the intention to make it impossible for the mortgagee to use it as a siren.

On April 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) established the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Nowon-gu L and 204, and (b) transferred the registration of the NST3 vehicle owned by the victim Alca to H on April 18, 2012, with respect to the NM3 vehicle in the name of the social group that created a mortgage by the victim Alca, and (c) sold it to the third party on September 2, 2012; (d) on April 11, 2013, the Defendant intentionally closed the KH and did not undergo the voluntary cancellation procedure for the said vehicle; and (e) upon ex officio cancellation from the Nowon-gu office on September 2, 2013, the victim’s mortgage established on the said SM3 vehicle was cancelled; and (e) registered the said SM3 vehicle as the

In addition, from that time to January 2, 2014, the Defendant entered the list of crimes in the attached form as above.

arrow