beta
Text
[Defendant A] The defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.
451,866,607 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.
The above additional collection charge.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant, “2014 Highest 8052” (Defendant A) from April 2012 to January 2013, 201, is a person who actually operated AH Co., Ltd. from November 201 to June 2013, and AH Co., Ltd. from December 2011 to June 2013.
The Defendant: (a) as the operator of the said 3 rental car company, transferred the vehicle owned by the Defendant under the name of the Defendant: (b) E, F, C, G, AJ, D, B, and the Defendant Company: (c) as the owner of the said 3 rental car, the vehicle owned by the Defendant and the Defendant Company: (d) transferred the vehicle under the name of the Defendant: (e) the Defendant: (e) regardless of the possession of the vehicle, the Defendant created a false appearance, such as the use of the vehicle under the possession of the Defendant Company, and made it difficult for the mortgagee to find the location of the vehicle; (b) intentionally discontinued the her company; (c) avoided the registration of the vehicle; and (d) made it impossible for the Victim to ex officio cancel the mortgage established on the vehicle without debt; and (e) disposed of the vehicle as a public offering by the borrower to any third party at the price increased by the amount of the mortgaged mortgage claim; and (e) made it impossible for the Victim to exercise the rights of the victim;
1. On April 19, 2012, the Defendant was committing a public offering with E and F, with respect to the vehicle leasing business by taking over the AG operated by Young-gu AG 105, Young-gu, Young-si, AK 105, while the Defendant transferred the registration under the name of the victim AG, around June 13, 2012, with respect to the ALS vehicles owned by the victim AG, which were mortgaged by the victim AG, and then intentionally closed the AG on January 2, 2013, without undergoing voluntary cancellation procedures on the said vehicle, by obtaining ex officio cancellation from the viewing on March 25, 2013, and E was subject to the cancellation of the mortgage of the victim IF, the victim corporation established on the said vehicle by obtaining ex officio cancellation from the viewing on March 25, 2013.