beta
Text
1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the court of first instance shall be revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to the revoked part shall be revoked.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The reasoning for this Court’s explanation is as follows: 1. The reasoning for this Court’s ruling is as follows: “The basic facts are the same as the part’s entry; thus, they are cited in accordance with the text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.”
Under the second second judgment of the first instance court, the "Korea Home Shopping Co., Ltd." in the fourth sentence is called "Korea Home Shopping Co., Ltd.".
The following shall be added between the second and second sentence of the first instance judgment:
“3) The Plaintiff entered into a contract for construction work with the Korea Land Comprehensive Construction Corporation in relation to the instant container construction work and commenced construction work on or around November 2001, but the construction work was suspended due to the failure of the Si Construction Corporation on or around February 2003.
(2) At the time of suspension, the Plaintiff, “(2)” of the 3rd 11st 11th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th,
A) On January 6, 2006, the same seal signed a land trust business agreement to build a new building by means of a land trust with a sale-type land on the same day." "B No. 11" is added to the 11th [based on recognition] of the first instance judgment.
The plaintiff's assertion and judgment parties' assertion that the defendant did not perform the obligations stipulated in the business agreement of this case, such as not concluding a contract for postal administration construction and construction with a lapse of one year from the date of the conclusion of the instant business agreement ( February 2, 2006), and further, damages equivalent to the plaintiff's damages for delay from February 3, 2008 to September 28, 2010, 556,645,103 won, and damages for delay from September 29, 2010 to November 9, 2012, including damages for delay from February 2, 2008 to November 2, 208,05,412,226 won.