The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The defendant is the director of the department of the D expenditure company, the victim E (the remaining and the age of 69) of the LAB representative director, the director of the LAB, and the director of the management office of the LAB.

On September 28, 2018, around 16:35, the Defendant notified the dismissal of the victim with the representative director within the management office of the sixth floor of the F building in the Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, along with the representative director, and assaulted the victim by hand in order to take away the management passbook in the building in custody when the victim tried not to offer it.

2. The burden of proof of criminal facts ought to be proven by a judge to have high probability beyond reasonable doubt, and if there is no evidence to establish such a degree of conviction, there is a doubt of guilt against the defendant even if there is no evidence to establish a conviction.

Even if there is no choice but to judge the interests of the defendant.

The main evidence of the facts charged in this case is the witness E's legal statement, the police's statement about E's statement, the E's statement and the motion for challenge.

E stated to the effect that it was assaulted by the Defendant under the same circumstances as the facts charged from the investigative agency to the court.

However, the following circumstances seem to exist in the statements of the above E.

In other words, in the court, E stated to the effect that “The Defendant and C had been spawn and spawn at the time, and had been spawn and spawn in order to get the head of the Tong from the head of the Tong when they entered the country without having entered the spawn,” and that “The head of the Tong was spawn and the head of the Tong was spawn.”

그런데 E이 진술한 내용과 같이 손에 통장을 쥔 채 주머니에 반도 들어가지 않은 상태에서 빠른 속도로 손목과 팔이 끌려 나가게 된다면, 증인의 진술처럼 손목만 끌려 나온 채 통장은 주머니...