logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.02.09 2015고단5128
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On December 2, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a B-type cargo vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license from around approximately 2 km section from around the roads of the Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the roads of the Nam-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju to the roads of the 73rd high school.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B Poter cargo vehicles in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Road Traffic Act;

On December 2, 2015, the Defendant driven B Poter Cargo Vehicles without the driver's license as described in paragraph 1 of around 07:30 on December 2, 2015, and proceeded at a speed of about 20km at a speed of about 73 kilometers in front of the Songwon High School, which is located in the 73-ro, Namnam-gu, Gwangju, via a two-lane from the Pungdong to the high-speed speed of about 70km.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive the steering gear, brake system, etc. and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded in the same way as it was, and the victim C (the 57-year-old driver), who was stopped for signal waiting at the same lane, was also driven by the victim C (the 57-year-old driver), as the front part of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim C, such as salt, tensions, etc. in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to the above occupational negligence, and at the same time damaged the victim E and F’s car to be in excess of KRW 495,066.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act is a holder of B Poter freight.

No person shall operate any motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance on a road.

Nevertheless, the defendant operated the cargo vehicle on the road which was not covered by mandatory insurance, such as the statement in Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1.

arrow