1. The defendants' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. Basic facts

A. Plaintiff A and B, C, and D (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”) are business entities leasing and operating construction machinery, such as refacing seasons. On December 29, 201, the boarding industry is a company that obtained permission to collect earth and stone from the head of the Gun in the area located in the area located in the Namnam-Gun F, and Defendant C’s land and the purpose of collecting earth and stone is the company for the purpose of Defendant C’s solar industry and Defendant C’s stone.

B. On January 2013, the Defendant Thai Industries contracted for the collection of earth and rocks (hereinafter “instant construction”) from the passenger-based industry, and requested Plaintiff A and C to conduct the crushing of rocks using the excavating machine (hereinafter “instant work”). From around that time, Plaintiff A and C performed the instant construction work by operating the excavating machine at the site of the instant construction.

C. On October 6, 2013, Defendant Thai Industries discontinued the instant construction work and completed it on the spot.

On September 1, 2013, the passenger's industry asked Defendant C-Woo to suspend the instant construction. Upon the above request, Defendant C-Woo continued the instant construction from October 7, 2013, and suspended the instant construction on November 30, 2013, and after December 1, 2013, Defendant C-Woo directly performed the instant construction work.

E. Plaintiffs A, C, and B, and D, which were later posted to the construction site of this case, continue to perform the work of this case despite the above change of the construction entity. The details are as follows:

In Table 1, prior to October 6, 2013, the number of work days (day) unpaid with the Plaintiff’s vehicle number (Defendant Thai Industries Corporation) (the Defendant Thai Industries Corporation) from October 7, 2013 to November 30, 2013 (Defendant Thai Industries Corporation) G 21,230,000 from December 1, 2013 to December 4, 2013 (Defendant Thai Industries Corporation) G 21,230,000 from H 513 B Ix 283 CJ 283,720,000, 193D Kx 11 L/ 11 [based], the purport of each of the arguments, as a whole, and the purport of each of the arguments and arguments.

2. Determination as to the claim against the defendant Tae-Gyeong Industrial Complex.