A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On January 19, 2010, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,50,000 by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Northern District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on September 10, 2015, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2,00,000 by a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and on June 20, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 8,00,000 as a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Suwon District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On March 2, 2018, the Defendant driven a seeable car under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.077% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license from approximately 30 meters in the section from the front of the Kama-si Suwon to the front road of the Kama-si Suwon-si, D in the state of under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.07% in blood.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle in a manner set forth in D.

On March 2, 2018, the Defendant, as set forth in Paragraph 1 of the same Article, driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.077% in blood without obtaining a driver’s license, and led the Defendant to drive the said car in the influence of alcohol level of 0.07% in the blood, and drive the front road B in front of the water zone in Yongsan-si, Permitted-si. B from the surface of the Dongcheon-si to the intersection, the

At the same time, prior to the same direction, the victim E(n.e., 42 years old) driving followed the FWO car, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to take into account the situation and maintain the safety distance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this and received the part of the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle back to the damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as fluoral salt, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment, due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. The actual survey report and on-site photographs;