logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.02.01 2018노1684
상해등
Text

All appeals filed by the defendant and prosecutor are dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment of the lower court (a fine of three million won) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine the reasoning of the judgment and the prosecutor together.

Although there are circumstances where the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor or a fine more than once as a violent crime, and the victim committed the crime in this case during the repeated crime period, the court below rejected the defendant's assertion that the defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a special injury by the Seoul Northern District Court on December 19, 2018, and two years and six months since the defendant appealed from the appeal court (the crime of special injury and the crime of injury in this case can be judged at the same time), there is no special circumstance or change that can be newly considered in sentencing after the sentence of the court below, and all other sentencing circumstances such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, family relation, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and circumstances after the sentence of the court below, it does not seem that the defendant's punishment imposed by the court below is heavy or it is unfair. Thus, all the defendant and the prosecutor's assertion are rejected.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed under Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, pursuant to Article 25(1) of the Rules on Criminal Procedure, in a case where: (a) the criminal records and the three-party 1 and two-party 2 of the judgment of the court below are punished by a fine, each of which is chosen to delete the two-party 1 and two-party 1 of the judgment of the court below, it shall not be deemed a repeated crime (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 95Do163

arrow