logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구고등법원 2016.05.11 2015나23629
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (appointed party)'s appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff (Appointed Party).

Reasons

1. Where the plaintiff appealed from the court of first instance does not significantly differ from the contents of the plaintiff's assertion in the court of first instance, and all of the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the purport of the whole arguments in the court of first instance and the court of first instance, even if the plaintiff examined the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the whole purport of the arguments in the court of first instance, the plaintiff's assertion that the designated parties were appointed from the designated parties of first instance (hereinafter "designated parties", and the remaining designated parties except for them were designated from the designated parties of first instance, the plaintiff did not submit a letter of appointment of the designated parties in the name of the designated parties in the court of first instance, but the plaintiff failed to submit a letter of appointment of the designated parties in the name of the designated parties in the name of the designated parties in the court of first instance, and it is evident that the records were not submitted in the court of first instance). The plaintiff's assertion that all of the designated parties were not legitimate and acceptable for all of the plaintiff's remaining grounds for rejection.

Therefore, the court's explanation on the instant case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with the main text of Article 420 of the Civil

2. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is unlawful in the case of the designated parties listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and all claims of the plaintiff and the remaining designated parties are dismissed as it is without merit. The judgment of the court of first instance is just in this conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow