A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

The defendant was living together with the victim D(V, 46 years old) and about one year.

On March 20, 2017, at around 23:40, the Defendant: (a) sealed the video image with a Handphone on the body of the Defendant’s residence in Jung-gu Incheon, Jung-gu, Incheon; (b) and (c) the victim took her blick; (b) assaulted the victim by using a method of blicking the victim’s head in six blicks; and (d) assaulting the victim by using a click method, which is a dangerous object in that place, when the head of the victim was clicked on one occasion; and (b) inflicted injury on the victim, such as dives, dump, salt, etc.,

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the Kamerasos photographs and damaged photographs;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 53 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (Article 55 and Article 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (The following extenuating circumstances among the reasons for sentencing)

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his defense counsel under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (the following grounds for sentencing)

1. The defendant and his defense counsel acknowledged the fact that the defendant had six tacks of the victim, but they do not have the fact that he had the victim's head as Kamera.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence adopted and examined by this court, the court may acknowledge the fact that the victim inflicted an injury on the Damp, sale, salt, etc., by assaulting the victim as indicated in the judgment of the court.

(1) From an investigative agency to this court, the victim has consistently met with the defendant's head from the criminal investigation agency to six son's body and one time as Kamerasia.

It is difficult to find out circumstances that the victim's statement was exaggerated or false.

(2) A victim took photographs of the damaged body immediately after the victim was assaulted by the defendant, and on March 22, 2017, the victim took a diagnosis of injury at the hospital.