Text
1. The Defendant-Counterclaim Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) KRW 65,925,841, and KRW 43,283,894 and the Plaintiff-Counterclaim Defendant C.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. Status 1 of the person involved in the case is the deceased A (hereinafter “the deceased”).
) The Gyeong National University Hospital (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Hospital”) is D students.
() A person who received treatment in the court on June 24, 2013 is the deceased’s wife, the Plaintiff B is the only child of the deceased, and the Plaintiff C is the sole child of the deceased. The instant lawsuit was initially filed by the deceased and the Plaintiffs. As the deceased died during the process of the lawsuit, the Plaintiffs took over the lawsuit against the deceased. 2) The Defendant is a school juristic person operating the Defendant hospital.
B. On August 22, 2008, the deceased was hospitalized at the treatment power plant of the deceased and the Defendant Hospital. On August 22, 2008, the deceased was hospitalized at the E Hospital with the 3-4 clive signboard escape symptoms to remove spine and remove the escape disc. After that, at the E Hospital’s hospital on October 10, 2008, the clive signboard escape symptoms continued to occur, and the clive signboard escape symptoms were implemented on April 7, 2009. After that, the deceased complained of the pain of the clives and the clives of the clives, and was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on May 12, 2010, the deceased was hospitalized at the Defendant Hospital on May 2, 2010.
C. 1) The Defendant hospital attempted to photograph the Deceased on six occasions from May 13, 2010 to May 18, 2010, the Defendant hospital attempted to do so on six occasions with respect to the Deceased. However, the Deceased could not maintain the attitude that the Deceased might suffer by pain. The Defendant hospital used chemicals, such as carbafin and petidine, to realize the Deceased at the time of the Defendant hospital’s motion to photograph the Deceased. 2) The Defendant hospital diagnosed the Deceased on May 6, 2010, based on the results of the RI taken from the Seoul Asan Hospital on May 6, 2010 at the Defendant hospital and the results of the CT taken on May 14, 2010 at the Defendant hospital, and determined that the Deceased’s disease was diagnosed as c-5 spinecul in the c-5 verteculic catization and implementation of the therapy and therapy.
3..