logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.28 2014고단1733
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant did not pay the victim C retirement allowance of 14,060,419 won as the employer of the B Company from April 18, 2008 to August 12, 2013, within 14 days from the date of retirement without an agreement between the parties on the extension of the due date.

2. Determination

(a) Crimes of non-violation of will: proviso of Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act;

(b) Declaration of intention that the victim does not want punishment after prosecution;

(c) Public prosecution dismissal: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;

arrow