logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 부천지원 2019.09.26 2019고정545
근로자퇴직급여보장법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is an employer who implements a new construction work of the building B in Nam-si with three full-time workers employed by an individual constructor, and the Defendant was employed from March 6, 2017 to July 7, 2018 at the above construction site, and the Defendant did not pay KRW 4,359,851 of retirement allowances C retired from office within 14 days from the date on which the cause for such payment occurred without an agreement on extension of the due date between the parties concerned.

2. Applicable provisions to the facts charged: Article 44 subparagraph 1 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act and Article 9 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits: Judgment dismissing employees' expression of intention not to punish after an indictment under the proviso to Article 44 of the Guarantee of Workers' Retirement Benefits Act: Article 327

arrow