1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court in this case concerning the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where part of the judgment of the court of first instance is dismissed as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of

(Other contents asserted by the Plaintiff in this court are not significantly different from the contents asserted by the Plaintiff in the first instance trial, and even if all of the submitted evidence is examined, the judgment of the first instance court that rejected the Plaintiff’s assertion is justifiable). The three-dimensional “Defendant” in the third instance shall be deemed to be “Defendant,” and the “Defendant,” in the same fourth instance, shall be deemed to be “Plaintiff,” respectively.

3. The following 1 letter boxes consisting of the Defendant “Defendant” to “Plaintiff.”

4 The 112:00 square boxes shall be cut to "12:00 square meters".

Under 8, "Rules on Disciplinary Action, etc. for Public Educational Officials" shall be amended to "Rules on Disciplinary Action, etc. for Public Educational Officials (amended by Ordinance of the Ministry of Education No. 135, Jul. 26, 2017; hereinafter the same shall apply)".

2. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is.