logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.01.21 2014누3770
산업재해보상보험휴업급여지급이행청구
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is as follows, with the exception of adding "it is insufficient to reverse the judgment of the court of first instance even if the plaintiff presented reasons and evidence favorable to it in this court," and therefore, it is identical to the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance. Therefore, it is acceptable to accept it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

3 Sheet d.

The second line "2. 20 December 2010" shall be " December 30, 2010".

3. The second table " December 25, 2005" shall be read as " November 25, 2005".

5,6th below the 3rd part, “the deduction and deletion of the details of employment employed and worked by the plaintiff” shall be deleted.

2. The judgment of the first instance court at the conclusion is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

arrow