The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (2 million won in penalty and 24 hours in sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession of and reflect on the instant crime, and that he was the first offender.

B. However, in full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s body shooting at a public place and the nature of the offense is not good, the victims did not agree, and the damage was not recovered, and the Defendant’s age, the background of the offense, and the circumstances after the offense, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant as seen earlier, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, even if considering the aforementioned circumstances favorable to the Defendant.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.