The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (unfair sentencing) of the lower court’s punishment (two months of imprisonment and twenty-four hours of sexual assault treatment programs) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the defendant confessions the crime of this case and reflects his gender, and that there is no criminal record for the same kind of crime.

B. However, in full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, background, and circumstance after committing the crime, the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant as seen earlier, even if the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, in view of the following circumstances, such as the Defendant’s photograph of the potential victim’s body, and thereby making it difficult to agree with the victim, and failure to recover damage, and failure to recover damage.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.