beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is a person engaged in the sale and purchase of construction sections in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, in operating a mutual co-ordination point of “C”.
1. On April 2016, the Defendant: (a) purchased a victim’s name and non-owned market price, which was the victim’s non-owned property, from D, from the first 08:00, the first maid point of April 2016, at around 08:00, one of the Defendant purchased the victim’s name and non-owned market price.
In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade of construction section, has a duty of care to confirm and describe the personal information of D, while also to verify the process of acquisition of the B, motive for sale, and price suitable for the transaction price, etc. of the B/C.
Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and purchased the 30,000 won of the price of the Bade, which was negligent in neglecting the judgment on the stolen property.
2. On April 2016, the Defendant: (a) purchased one 300,000 won prior to the market price owned by the victim E, which he stolen from D, from the public point of “C” around 08:00, the date of April 2016, at around 08:00, the Defendant purchased the same.
In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the sales business of the construction section, has neglected his/her duty of care, such as the statement in Paragraph 1, and has purchased the preceding 50,000 won by negligence, as long as he/she neglected the judgment on the stolen property.
3. On April 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) purchased one set of 3,50,000 won prior to the market price of the victim F, which was the victim F, who was stolen from D from D at the above “C’s public store around April 17, 2016 to 08:00; and (b) purchased one set of 3,50,000 won prior to the market price of the victim F, which was the victim F, which he stolen from D.
In this case, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade of construction section, has neglected his duty of care, such as the statement in Paragraph 1, and has purchased the 30,000 won of the above brinal and the above brinal to 70,000 won of the price by negligence while neglecting the judgment on the stolen property, although he neglected to do so.
Ultimately, the Defendant is above.