1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled or added below, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The 4th 12th, 6th 3, 7th 3, and 8th 6th 6 of the first instance court "this court" shall be written with all "the first instance court".

The term "the injury and disease of this case" in the first instance court letter 6th, 7th, 3th, 4th, 8th, 6-7th, and 11th shall be applied to all "the additional injury and disease of this case".

After the 7th day of the first instance judgment, “the Plaintiff presented a proposal” in the 7th day of the 7th day of the 7th day of the 1st instance judgment, “The Plaintiff’s opinion on the medical record appraisal is based on the wrong application of the SSM-5 (B) diagnosis standard for external stress disorder, or the failure to properly examine the Plaintiff’s comprehensive psychological examination (Evidence A7) and the health insurance benefit payment details (Evidence A12). However, in light of the process and process of the first instance court’s entrustment of the medical record appraisal and the fact inquiry, each attached document attached thereto, and the above response of the appraisal, it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s above assertion solely on the basis of the entries or images of evidence A14, A15-1, and 2 of the

Seoul High Court 2016Nu66386, "At present......." part of the last 2 weeks of the first instance judgment was finalized through the Seoul High Court 2016Nu6386.

"Flags".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.