The judgment of the court below is reversed.

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not have violated the signal at the time when the defendant entered the intersection of this case immediately before the accident of this case occurred.

2. The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by the records, i.e., ① the Defendant consistently confirmed the right-hand turn signal of the traffic signal installed on the front side of the instant accident from the investigative agency to the trial court, and stated that the Defendant entered the instant intersection after confirming the right-hand turn signal. ② According to the traffic signal system of the traffic signal installed at the instant intersection at the time of the accident, the left-hand turn signal in the direction of the Defendant is turned on 18 seconds, and the yellow signal turns on the right-hand turn and the right-hand turn turn turn on the victim’s right-hand turn at the same time, ③ the vehicle in the direction of the Defendant entered the instant intersection at the time of the accident, and there is no need for about 5 seconds time from the time of the entry to the left-hand turn turn turn, and if the Defendant reported that the yellow signal was turned to the right-hand turn signal prior to the instant intersection, and there is no possibility that there was a conflict between the Defendant and the victim’s vehicle at the time of the accident and the victim’s right-hand.

3...