logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.06 2014나66986
손해배상(자)
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A shall be modified as follows:

The defendant shall have against the plaintiff A 197,498.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the partial modification of the scope of the liability for damages against the plaintiff A of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall be cited as it is by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The changed part ① Exemption from the charge for the use of a higher-class hospital (No. 6th of the first instance judgment) (No. 7th of the first instance judgment): 1,378,829 won: The fee for the use of a higher-class hospital shall be changed to KRW 1,243,829 (excluding KRW 135,00,000, since there are no special circumstances such as that the medical treatment in question was hospitalized in a higher-class hospital due to the nature of the medical treatment in question or that there was no choice but to use a higher-class hospital due to the lack of a general hospital).

(2) On October 1, 2014, the following expenses for future medical treatment shall be deemed disbursed on the date following the date of closing argument in this case, for the convenience of calculating the base date of the disbursement of future medical expenses (from No. 6 pages 9 to 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance):

Since there is no evidence that the following medical expenses have been paid until the date of the closing of argument in the trial of the Party B, each of the following expenses shall be deemed disbursed on September 2, 2015 on the day following the date of the closing of argument in the trial of the Party.

shall be changed to the section.

③ The requirements for 6,107,760 won (the first disbursement on October 1, 2014, which is the day following the date of closing the argument in this case) shall be deemed to have been made on December 16, 2014 every year from the date when four years have elapsed since the date of water due to drugs, physical therapy, etc. (from 6. 18th to 20th e of the judgment of the first instance court), and the calculation thereof shall be as shown in the calculation table of expenses for future treatment.

(E) E) The first instance court’s appraisal (psychotropic surgery) evaluated that the treatment costs of KRW 6,107,760 each year was spent by December 16, 2014, four years after the date of the award due to drugs, physical therapy, etc., but there is no evidence that the said treatment costs were spent until the date of closing argument in the court of the first instance, which was later than December 16, 2014.

arrow