The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On February 20, 2016, at around 05:10 on February 20, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed, without any justifiable reason, the victim D (50 years) who was mixed with drinking food at the next cafeteria located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; (b) expressed a desire to “unrefilled ringer”; and (c) expressed a threat that the son who was on the table of the table will be able to gather.

In this regard, the victim has not been deemed to have been in the Republic of Korea, and why why is the victim.

“...” The proprietor of the above restaurant is “man,” and the speaker and the defendant are “low farbly impule..”

It is called "gradation of death", and the victim was abused by her hand when her kylbling the victim from the cell phone.

2. The crime of assaulting the victim is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which is an offense of assaulting the victim under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the written agreement submitted on April 28, 2016, the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant or withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the institution of the instant indictment.

Therefore, according to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act, the public prosecution of this case against the defendant is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.