The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is the president of C in the immediately following the apartment B at the time of militaryposting the facts charged, and the victim D ( South, 55 years old) is the head of the team in charge of parking management of the above apartment.

On June 5, 2020, the Defendant reported that the damaged person was posted a parking-out Stickick on the street in the apartment complex B, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, the Defendant was not parked more than 10 minutes, and the Defendant’s sign was attached;

A person who is a party does not have a virtue to speak, Doz. Doz. Doz. Doz.

“Fastly sounded the victim’s chest part was tightly pushed down twice by the victim.”

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. The facts charged in this part of the judgment cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act as a crime falling under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. Since the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case, the defendant is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.