The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for up to eight months) of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The fact that the Defendant appears to have led to the confession of each of the crimes of this case and to reflect his mistake. Considering the circumstances favorable to the Defendant, including the fact that it is necessary to consider equity in cases where each of the crimes of this case and the first head of the crime of this case as indicated in the judgment of the court below was judged simultaneously with the crime where each of the crimes of this case and the crime of first head of the crime of this case became final and conclusive, the Defendant appears to have failed to reach an agreement with the victims of the crime of this case and the victims of the crime of this case in violation of the Labor Standards Act, and that a significant portion of damage was not recovered. Other circumstances such as the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime of this case, and other various sentencing conditions stipulated in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, including the circumstances before and after the crime, etc., and there are no materials newly presented in the course of the judgment of the court below during the trial of punishment (see, e.g., Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do3260).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.