The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., a fine of three million won) of the lower court against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The facts that the Defendant led to the confession of the instant crime and reflects his mistake, and that the equity should be taken into account when the first head of the crime in the judgment below and the crime in the judgment of the court below became final and conclusive, etc. However, the instant crime is a case where the Defendant did not take any measures while drinking and driving without a license, and thus, the vehicle 5 cost was damaged due to the accident and the damage was not recovered therefrom, and the Defendant again committed the instant crime even though he had the history of criminal punishment several times due to traffic-related crimes, etc., which are disadvantageous to the Defendant. In addition, the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, etc., as well as various sentencing conditions prescribed in Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the circumstances before and after the instant crime, and the circumstances that the court below is judged to have exceeded the reasonable limit of discretion of sentencing determination, and the Defendant’s assertion that the Defendant had no new evidence to be found to be unfair in the course of the immediate sentencing examination (see Supreme Court en banc Decision 2015Do360, Jul. 23, 23, 2015).

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.