beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against Plaintiff A, which constitutes the following additional payments.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On July 26, 2012, Plaintiff C and D are the parents of Plaintiff A who suffered water-related accidents as follows during water play in the instant swimming pool on July 26, 2012, and Plaintiff B are the births of Plaintiff A.
On May 18, 2012, Defendant E (hereinafter “Defendant E”) obtained permission for the commercial use of the swimming pool facilities of this case from the Han River Business Headquarters affiliated with Defendant Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “Defendant Seoul Metropolitan Government”), instead of distinguishing it from Defendant Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the purpose of using the swimming pool facilities of this case (hereinafter “instant permission”).
Defendant F is an employee of Defendant E, who served as the head of the instant swimming pool from June 28, 2012 to August 24, 2012, and Defendant G is employed by Defendant E from July 28, 2012 to July 28, 2012 and served as safety personnel in the instant swimming pool.
B. (1) On July 26, 2012, Plaintiff A and Plaintiff B, who was the mother, play water in the swimming pool of the instant swimming pool, along with Plaintiff D and B, who was the mother on July 26, 2012. From 17:45 to 18:00 on the same day, Plaintiff D, who was the mother of Plaintiff A and B, had the mother of Plaintiff B, and had the mother of Plaintiff B, had the mother of the infant swimming, and then Plaintiff D, who became the mother of Plaintiff B, had the mother of Plaintiff B, had the mother near the infant swimming pool, had an accident of approximately 30 to 40 meters away from the said gate, and had it taken place in water (hereinafter “instant accident”).
Defendant G, who was assigned as the safety personnel of the youth pool at the time she was posted, was in opposition to the point where the instant accident occurred, but according to Defendant G’s protocol of interrogation of the suspect (No. 1-1), Defendant G was about the injury caused by occupational negligence on December 27, 2012.