logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.07.25 2018고단4824
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

The application for compensation of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 19, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for fraud and 2 years of suspended execution in the Military Court at the Army at the 31st Army on September 19, 2014. On August 3, 2015, the same court was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for fraud and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 3, 2015, the sentence of suspended execution was invalidated, and the execution of the final sentence was completed in the female prison on July 24, 2016.

"2018 Highest 4824"

1. On June 23, 2018, the Internet goods fraud Defendant posted a notice on the Defendant’s house located in Songpa-gu Seoul, Songpa-gu C and D, stating that he sells the fishing age on the Internet E bulletin board using a mobile phone, and false statement to the effect that “The victim F, who reported and contacted this fact, will send the money first to the victim F.”

However, even if the defendant received money from the victim F, he thought that he will use it as a personal living cost, and did not have the intention or ability to send the fishing era.

Nevertheless, the Defendant received KRW 255,00 from the victim F to the G account in the name of the Defendant, and received the total sum of KRW 3,775,000 from the victims over 12 times from that time to September 5, 2018, as indicated in the separate crime list.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victims to acquire financial benefits from the victims.

2. On October 21, 2018, the Defendant: (a) connected the Defendant’s house located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and D with the online game I using a computer; (b) contacted the VictimJ, who posted the text of selling the game items, with K, that “the Defendant traded in KRW 9.60,00 won at the home L site to be purchased by him; and (c) made the VictimJ to make a false statement of the purchase application written by a third party on L, as if the Defendant had been posted.”

However, it is not the defendant's written application for purchase that the defendant informed the victim J.

arrow