1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Circumstances for the review and decision of this case;

A. On March 1, 1999, the Plaintiff was appointed as a teacher at C Middle School operated by the Intervenor.

From around July 2009 to July 2012, the Plaintiff had sexual intercourses over 15 times with D, while maintaining internal relations with D, received money and goods equivalent to KRW 20 million in total from D, including bicycles, clothing, and so on. From around July 22:00 to around July 8, 2012 to around 02:00, the Plaintiff was committed on July 8, 2012 by phone call from D to D’s husband. The Plaintiff committed suicide on July 8, 2012.

The above act of the plaintiff is an act that seriously damages the duty to maintain dignity as a teacher by violating Article 61 (1) 3 of the Private School Act.

B. On August 31, 2012, an intervenor dismissed the Plaintiff for the following reasons.

C. On September 27, 2012, the Plaintiff filed a petition review with the Defendant seeking revocation of the above dismissal disposition.

On December 10, 2012, the defendant dismissed the plaintiff's request for review of the appeal on the ground that "the grounds for dismissal are recognized as well as the disciplinary action is appropriate."

(hereinafter referred to as “examination and decision of this case”). [Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 1, and purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the review and decision of this case is legitimate

A. The plaintiff's assertion that D had not actively commenced and maintained internal relations with D, but that D had access to acquiring economic benefits, etc. to the plaintiff, who was in charge of the chairperson of the emergency countermeasures against the council of occupants' representatives, by preventing real estate fraud and threatening many people, etc., which led to the plaintiff who was in charge of the chairperson of the council of occupants' representatives, and D had a false statement about his occupation, academic punishment, and history, etc., and the plaintiff tried not to maintain an internal relationship with D any longer, and D had a negative effect on D's own.