A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (U.S.) and the Road Traffic Act (U.S.) are those who are engaged in driving a rocketing car;

On April 11, 2013, the defendant driving the above car on April 21, 2013, and driving it on the water-based 416-dong, Nam-gu, Incheon Metropolitan City, the 13-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong

Since there is a central line installed, the defendant engaged in the driving of motor vehicles has a duty of care to operate the steering gear accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, who did not properly operate the steering gear under the influence of alcohol, was placed adjacent to the left side of the victim’s EMW car in the case of the victim’s EMW car, who was faced with the center line and transmitted at the opposite lane, and became a part above the left side of the said rocketing car.

The Defendant, by such occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim, such as the escape certificate of a conical signboard requiring treatment for about four weeks, and at the same time, escaped without immediately stopping the said BMW car to ensure that it would amount to KRW 7,925,966, and without taking measures, such as providing relief to the victim.

2. On April 11, 2013, at around 22:45, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to take a drunk measurement) and there are reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol, such as in-depth, drinking, heavy drinking, walking, etc., at the office of the traffic accident investigation department of the Incheon Southern-dong Police Station located in the Dong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Dong-gu, Incheon., the Defendant did not comply with the request without justifiable grounds despite being required from the InspectorF belonging to the above police station to take a drunk measurement for about 30 minutes from a respiratory measuring instrument.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police with D 1.