logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2013.09.11 2012가합1556
이행보증금 반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties is that the Plaintiff is a company operating the housing construction business, etc., and the Young Pung file company is a company operating the reinforced concrete construction business, etc., and the central water delivery company, the central ready-mixed company, and the gold SM company is an affiliated company of the Young Pung

B. On June 18, 2010, the date of the instant lawsuit, following the conclusion of the Understanding 1: (a) the soft Co., Ltd. received a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures on June 18, 2010, which was the date of the instant lawsuit, from 2009 to the date of the instant lawsuit; (b) the Central Product Distribution Co., Ltd. received a decision to commence rehabilitation procedures on June 18, 2010 to the date of the instant lawsuit; (c) the same date was 2010 dollars 10,000 at the same court; and (d) gold EM Co., Ltd received a decision to appoint a custodian as of April 1, 2013; and (d) the said court continued rehabilitation procedures until now (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant Young P Co., Ltd. and Defendant Young P Co., Ltd.’s custodian and custodian of the Central Product Rehabilitation P&M Co., Ltd., Ltd.; and (d) the rehabilitation debtor and custodian of the Defendant P&M Co., Ltd.

(2) The Defendants were to sell the Defendants according to the rehabilitation plan approved by the Cheongju District Court. On July 201, 201, Samil Accounting Firm was selected as a sales main agent and announced on September 26, 201 that the Defendants would be simultaneously sold through capital increase with new shares issued by a third party through an open competitive bid method and corporate bonds acquired by issuing new shares issued by a third party. On September 26, 2011, the Defendants provided information, such as a letter of intent of acceptance, to the applicants for acquisition

3. On October 28, 201, the Plaintiff’s intention to take over to Samil Accounting Corporation.

arrow