logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.12.01 2016나2038472
기타
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the manager G of the rehabilitation company Dong Construction Industry, and the defendant (re-appellant).

Reasons

1. The plaintiff of the judgment subject to a retrial is confirmed in the complaint by the plaintiff, and the remaining defendants except the defendant Republic of Korea, as the main unit company of Dongdong Construction Constation Libya.

(a)Korea Transportation Corporation;

B. Although it was indicated as “Dongdong Construction Industry Co., Ltd.,” and it was corrected as “Dongdong Construction Industry Co., Ltd., Ltd.,” and under the overall purport of the arguments and arguments, Dongdong Construction Industry Co., Ltd., Ltd., as the Seoul Central District Court No. 2014hap146, Aug. 25, 2014; the rehabilitation plan approval order was issued on March 24, 2015; and the rehabilitation plan was currently being implemented, the lawsuit on the property of Dong Construction Industry Co.,,, Ltd., which is the debtor, shall be a party to the lawsuit (Article 78 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act). The Plaintiff expressed the parties to the lawsuit as “Dongdong Construction Industry Co.,, Ltd., Ltd., Ltd., 00, 000 U.S. dollars as the manager of Dong Construction Industry Co.,, Ltd., Ltd., 200, 300 U.S. dollars and 00, 2007.

On April 24, 2014, the Plaintiff’s East Asian Construction Industry.

arrow