1. The Defendant’s KRW 49,553,443 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from January 3, 2014 to December 22, 2015.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C refers to D Launa taxi at around 04:20 on January 3, 2014 (hereinafter “HA”) (hereinafter “HA”)

(B) the F front road in Daejeon Dong-gu E (hereinafter referred to as the “instant road”).

) Eul proceeds from the side of the Eastern-distance to the direction of the yellow-distance, while driving more than 60km/h of the road of this case 7.6km/h to 79.2km/h of the speed of the road of this case, and not closely emphasizing the front side of the road of this case, the crosswalk (hereinafter “instant crosswalk”) is to the right side on the left side of the running direction of the Ghana-Road of this case.

2) The Plaintiff was involved in the front part of the Lives Vehicle without avoiding G (hereinafter “instant accident”).

2) As a result, the Plaintiff suffered from the 7th anniversary of the left-hand crossing in need of approximately 12 weeks of treatment, and G died due to the 04:42 of the same day, G’s death due to the 04:42 of the same day. (2) C was indicted due to occupational injury or injury, and was sentenced to two years of suspended execution for August of the imprisonment without prison labor (Seoul District Court Decision 2014Da1474 decided Oct. 2, 2014), and its judgment became final and conclusive after the appellate court.

3) The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to available vehicles. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to available vehicles. The fact that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, and the entries and arguments in Gap's evidence

B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages suffered by the plaintiff due to the accident in this case as a mutual aid business operator of a sea-going vehicle.

C. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the statements and arguments set forth in Gap evidence Nos. 34, 36, 44, 46, and Eul evidence No. 2, the traffic signals of the instant crosswalk work in the way that the traffic signals of the instant crosswalks are repeated at 42 seconds and 98 seconds at 1:2:00 on 2:0,000, and at 1:00, the pedestrian signals of the instant crosswalks are green (However, the traffic signals of the instant crosswalks are green for 37 seconds, excluding 2 seconds before walking at 42:0,000 at 1:0,000) and the vehicle on the direction of the