logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2019.05.08 2018가단513349
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 65,285,078 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from March 28, 2017 to May 8, 2019, and the following.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The Plaintiff is a corporation entrusted with industrial accident compensation insurance business by the Minister of Employment and Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and the Defendant is an insurance company that entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with C with respect to D concrete pumps (hereinafter “instant vehicles”).

E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “E”) accepted a subcontract for reinforced concrete construction among the aforementioned new construction works from H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “H”) that received a contract for the F ground G construction in Naju, and H purchased industrial accident compensation insurance for workers at the said workplace.

E leased the instant vehicle driven by C for concrete building works among the above reinforced concrete construction works, and J around March 1, 2016, the instant vehicle was paid daily wages from E and worked on the construction site.

At around 15:45 on March 7, 2016, I, a driver of the instant vehicle, was using the instant vehicle in the instant G site to build a concrete building with a retaining wall of the first floor above the ground, and moved the instant vehicle. When moving the location of the instant vehicle to build a concrete building, he/she was obliged to install a support stand on the short ground so that the vehicle does not move due to ground subsidence, etc., or to build a support stand by neglecting it, while neglecting to install a support stand on the top of the front line after the front line of the instant vehicle, the ground at the lower bottom of the support unit after the front line of the instant vehicle was cut down below the top of the lower part of the instant vehicle, and thus, the victim J. who was in charge of another concrete building on the fence of the instant vehicle against the opposite side of the instant vehicle, and was in charge of the instant vehicle, so that the said victim J. J. Ha was shocking to the extent of the number of units and pollution.

arrow