logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.17 2017누65359
강제전보취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the plaintiff at the court of first instance is not different from the argument in the court of first instance, and the judgment of the court of first instance rejecting the plaintiff's claim is justified even if the evidence submitted by the court of first instance was based on the statements and reference of evidence Nos. 33 through 35 (including paper numbers) submitted by the court of first instance.

Therefore, the reasoning for the statement in this case is that the court below's reasoning is identical to the ground for the first instance judgment, except where "the instant warning 1" as "the instant warning 1", and "the six pages 9" as "B", and "the same" as "the first instance judgment." Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow