1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The cost of review shall be included in all the cost of intervention.

On May 20, 2013, the Plaintiff (hereinafter “Plaintiff”) filed a lawsuit for review of this case regarding the judgment subject to review on the grounds that the request for review of this case constitutes a case where it is evident that the request for review of this case is groundless based on court records, such as the chief of the retrial on January 13, 2014, and this court ordered the Plaintiff to deposit KRW 3,00,000 for the Defendant (Defendant) as a security for litigation costs within seven days from the date this decision became final and conclusive, in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Articles 117(2) and (1), 120, and 122 of the Civil Procedure Act, on the grounds that the request for review of this case constitutes a case where it is evident that the request for review of this case is groundless. The Plaintiff’s reappealed on May 20, 2014, but the Supreme Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s reappeal on May 20, 2014 (Supreme Court Decision 2014No333).

Therefore, pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 408 and the main text of Article 124 of the Civil Procedure Act, the litigation of this case shall be dismissed without holding any pleadings, and it is so decided as per Disposition.