1. The lawsuit of this case shall be dismissed.

2. The cost of review shall be included in all the cost of intervention.

On August 6, 2014, the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiff”) filed a lawsuit for review of this case regarding the judgment subject to review on the grounds that the request for review of this case constitutes a case where it is evident that the request for review of this case is groundless based on court records, such as the chief of a retrial office, etc. on August 25, 2014, and this court ordered the Plaintiff to deposit KRW 3,00,000 for the Defendant (the Defendant) as a security for litigation costs within seven days from the date this decision became final and conclusive, pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Articles 117(2) and (1), 120, and 122 of the Civil Procedure Act. The order to provide the above litigation costs was served on the Plaintiff on September 2, 2014, but became final and conclusive as it became final and conclusive due to the lack of any objection by the Plaintiff. Nevertheless, the fact that the Plaintiff did not provide a security not later than seven days from the date of final and conclusive is apparent or obvious.

Therefore, pursuant to Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 408 and the main text of Article 124 of the Civil Procedure Act, the litigation of this case shall be dismissed without holding any pleadings, and it is so decided as per Disposition.