A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

60,000 won from the defendant.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 2016, the Defendant administered Mebacopon (one name, "philopon"; hereinafter referred to as "philopon") around 20:00 on September 2016, the Defendant injectedd the philopon into the front door of the philopon in the north-gu in the city of Maddong-si in China (hereinafter referred to as "D") with the above D at the residence of the person who was killed in the name (one name, "D"; hereinafter referred to as "D") located in the north-gu in the city of Maddong-dong-si in China, with the foregoing D as soon as possible, putting the philopon into the front door of the philopic intake installed by a large width and glass, resulting in a delay by cutting the bottom of the philopon, as soon as possible.

2. On November 19, 2016, the Defendant, who administered phiphones, inhaled the phiphones in the above-mentioned D’s residence around November 19, 2016.

3. On March 2017, the Defendant inhaled approximately one gram of phiphonephone, along with E and E’s wife, in the residence of a person who was in the south of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Ma of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of Si of

4. On April 2017, the Defendant inhaled approximately one gram of phiphonephones in the foregoing E’s residence at around 21:00 on the date in which the Defendant 21:00 on April 2017.

5. On June 2017, the Defendant inhaled approximately one gram of phiphonephone in the foregoing E’s residence at around 21:00 on June 2017, the Defendant 201.

6. On July 1, 2017, the Defendant inhaled approximately one gram of phiphonephone in the foregoing E’s residence around July 1, 2017, at around 23:00, in the foregoing E’s residence.

Accordingly, even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, he administered philophones, which are a local mental medicine, over six times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The results of inspection of hot cans;

1. Each protocol of seizure, each reply to a request for appraisal, and each reply to a request for appraisal;

1. Each report on investigation;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing price lists of narcotics;

1. Article 60(1)2 and Article 4(1) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, Etc. for the sake of criminal facts and the selective punishment.