A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 24, 2016, the Defendant 06:09 around 06:09, the Defendant obstructed the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the handling of the report by the police public officials of E and F, by assaulting, such as plucking, plucking, etc. of the F, the left hand hand hand of the Defendant, who was a police official, by drinking, to the 112 notification, for the reason that the Defendant was under influence of alcohol, was broken the Defendant who was under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant was broken up the Defendant who was under the floor of the Sungnam Police Station D, the Sungnam Police Station affiliated with the Sungnam Police Station, which was called upon 112 notification.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by each police officer of the E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of four Acts and subordinate statutes to four photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order: The degree of interference with the performance of official duties is not less light. The favorable circumstances: The defendant's recognition of a crime and has no criminal record exceeding the suspension of execution;