A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant’s insultd on June 4, 2017: (a) around 11:00, in front of the Sinnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant was able to get off or off the bar in front of the Sinnam-si.

“Admonet victim E and C of the Sungnam Police Station D District of the Sungnam Police Station called up after receiving a report 112, and was on the street with the victim E and F of the police station.

G and H et al. “Is, C. C. H. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s. s.

E. A bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch, “A bitch bitch bitch bitch,” and “a bitch bitch bitch bitch fbitch h.h.” openly insulting victims, respectively.

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the time, at the place specified in paragraph 1 at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant used assaulting F’s body in his hand, f’s face, f’s f’s face, and f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’s f’

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. A detailed statement of the processing of reported cases;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing CCTV images;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act (a point of insult) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense (a point of obstructing the performance of official duties) of the same Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1)(the following favorable circumstances) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution is that there was a criminal record identical to the defendant, and even though police officers received 112 reports and demanded several times that the defendant should return home to the site and have been under the influence of alcohol, they continuously go to police officers, even though they continued to go home to the site, they led to each of the crimes of this case.

However, the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding fine for the same crime, and the defendant has led to confession and reflect on each of the crimes in this case.