logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2018. 06. 01. 선고 2017누88437 판결
1세택 1주택으로 의제되는 조합원입주권의 장기보유특별공제 적용대상 범위[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Suwon District Court-2017-Gu Group-8181 ( November 24, 2017)

Title

Scope of application of special long-term holding deduction for association member's relocation rights deemed one house at one age;

Summary

(1) The revised Income Tax Act, as in the first instance judgment, limits the scope of transfer margin to which special deduction for long-term holding is applied before the approval of the management and disposal plan, but limits the scope of transfer margin to which special deduction for long-term holding is applied to one member, and there is no violation of law

Related statutes

Article 95 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2017Nu8437 Revocation of Disposition of Levying Transfer Income Tax

Plaintiff

fixed**

Defendant

***The Director of the Tax Office

Conclusion of Pleadings

May 11, 2018

Imposition of Judgment

June 1, 2018

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The judgment of the first instance shall be revoked. The defendant's transfer income belonging to the plaintiff of March 11, 2016 to the plaintiff of March 2013.

The imposition of KRW 00 shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Quotation of the reasons for the judgment of the first instance;

The reason for this judgment is as follows: “57,235,280 won” of the first instance court 2, 2, 16, 2, 500 won; “57,217,099 won”; “one household house” of 5,00 in 9 shall be “one house for one household”; and “one house for one household” of 5,000 won is identical to the reason for the first instance judgment; therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act

2. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow