logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2014.10.28 2013가합4883
구상금
Text

The Defendants are 20,045,215 won to each Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 26, 2012 to October 28, 2014.

Reasons

Basic Facts

The plaintiff is a company engaged in construction and civil engineering, etc., and the defendant B is a person who runs a rental business, and has entered into an automobile insurance contract with the defendant LIG damage insurance company (hereinafter referred to as the "Defendant LIG").

The Plaintiff, while executing the new sports center construction work of D Middle Schools in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (hereinafter “instant construction work”), ordered Nonparty E to work, such as sn beamline installation, among the instant construction work, and Party E leased Defendant B to Nonparty G, who is a Crick driver, the Fricker of Grade 50t (hereinafter “instant rick”).

G removed waste materials stored on the second floor of the instant construction site on November 18, 2012, but was plucking or plucking up the booming part of the boom, which was set up by linking the waste materials to the end of the boom group, and was fooming the head, body, and bridge of E’s employee Nonparty H (Is, hereinafter “the deceased”) who was in the booming part of the said booming part of the third roof boom at the time, and died on its job.

(hereinafter “instant accident” (hereinafter “instant accident”), without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 5-1, and Eul evidence 5-2, and defendant B, as the lessor, are jointly obligated to pay to the plaintiff the above amount of KRW 125,00,000,00 to the plaintiff as compensation for damages, since the plaintiff paid the amount of KRW 125,00,00,00 to the deceased’s heir as a result of the violation despite the duty of care to take measures necessary to prevent danger, such as checking the members of the Creree and booms, whether the bree is abnormal in the booms, and whether the bree is abnormal in the construction site.

In addition, the instant accident occurred due to Defendant B’s negligence.

arrow