1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. The facts below the basis facts do not conflict between the parties or may be found in each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 11 (including branch numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply) by reference to the whole purport of the pleadings. (a)

On October 1, 1911, the land cadastre of Gyeonggi-do H 376 square meters is indicated as being subject to the assessment by the “JJ of Jincheon-do, Jincheon-gun, Jincheon-do,” and there is no other personal information about J, the above circumstance’s name.

B. The land of the 376 square meters prior to the Gyeonggi-gun H was divided into two parcels, and was divided into the 453 square meters in the wife population at the time of Gyeonggi-do and the 790 square meters in the wife population G at the time of Gyeonggi-si (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. The Plaintiffs, as L’s decedents, constitute 1/6 of the details of their inheritance shares.

2. The same person and L, the inheritee of the Defendants, revealed to the Plaintiffs’ Land Survey Division that the instant land was assessed, are the same.

The name of the person in charge of land investigation is written by J, and the person in charge of land investigation is written as L, but the person in charge of land investigation is written as J and next L when the person in charge of land investigation is found to be the same person.

In addition, the address of the network J on the land investigation injury is "Yecheon-gun, J. J. J. The address of the network L, which is recorded in the original copy, is "Yecheon-gun, J. J.," but the O of the land investigation injury is originally located in J. J, J., as the area of Jincheon-gun, J. P. as the area of Jincheon-gun in 1914 administrative district, and Q. Q., according to the name of O and P, has changed to Q. The above address is substantially the same.

On the other hand, the land of this case is unregistered land in the state of land to be restored to the landowner pursuant to Article 754 of the Act on Land Survey, Waterway Survey and Cadastral Records, and since the person who registered the land has not been registered, the plaintiffs are to confirm the ownership of the land of this case.