1. The Defendant falls under each category of inheritance shares listed in the separate sheet No. 1 list, respectively.

1. Basic facts

A. The court’s position on May 21, 191, where the land investigation division prepared by the General Dogwon of the Joseon-si, which was in force during the Japanese colonial era, stated that the land investigation division prepared by the General Dog-gun of the Joseon-si, the wife population E (hereinafter “instant land”) was in the Fri-gun of the Permitted-gun (the administrative district was successively changed to the Ggri-gun of the Permitted-gun, the Hri-si, and the wife population I), was located in the Republic of Korea.

B. The land cadastre of the instant assessment land was restored to the area of 665 square meters, L road of 516 square meters, and the area of 172 square meters before M. The land cadastre for the instant assessment land was restored to the area of 665 square meters prior to K, and the area of L road of 516 square meters was converted to the area and the change of administrative jurisdiction, etc., each of the real estate listed in the attached Table (hereinafter “instant land”).

C. On the old land cadastre, N with the address in Gri-gun Gri is registered as the owner with respect to the land whose land of this case was divided.

The land of this case is currently unregistered.

E. On the other hand, the plaintiff's capital increase divisionO resided in Gyeonggi-gun P, Gyeonggi-gun P, and died on June 4, 1932, and Q was succeeded to the sole inheritance of Q, Australia. Q died on July 11, 1958, and Q succeeded to the sole inheritance of R on April 13, 198, while R died on April 13, 198. The spouse and the defendants were the children of R, but S died on September 14, 2018, and the defendants succeeded to the property of Q.

After all, R's property was inherited to the plaintiffs in proportion to attached Form 2's inheritance shares.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 11 (including each number in the case of additional number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Prior to the determination as to the cause of the claim, the following circumstances, namely, ① the assessment titleholder of the assessment land and the Plaintiffs’ increased portionO, are the same as Chinese name; ② the Plaintiffs’ increased portion of the Plaintiffs’ increased portion of the legal domicile, Q, and R’s birth P, written in the land survey register concerning the land of this case.