logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 01. 18. 선고 2016두51887 판결
(심리불속행) 이 사건 가지급금의 인정이자 미수액을 익금에 산입할 수 있는지 여부[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2015Nu59312 ( August 30, 2016)

Title

(C) Whether the amount of the provisional payment of this case can be included in the gross income.

Summary

(b) The Plaintiff cannot be deemed to have justifiable grounds to exclude inclusion of the Plaintiff’s shares in the gross income and attempted amount in the gross income, since the Plaintiff could not be provided as security by the representative director as collateral for another obligee.

Related statutes

Article 26 of the Corporate Tax Act

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the grounds of appeal by the appellant are not included in the grounds provided by each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Thus, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent

arrow