Text
Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.
. The applicant.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged is that Defendant A worked as a child care teacher at E-care centers located in Daejeon Sung-gu, Daejeon from March 2015 to January 1, 2017. Defendant B was the head of the above child care center, who was the head of the above child care center, and was not reported on the child abuse crime.
A. As of November 2016, Defendant A’s day on which it is impossible to identify the date, 16:00-17:30, the day on which Defendant A’s child H(3) located next to that of the child care center F Class, such as the above child care center F Class, the kindergarten G(3) of the original child G(3) located at that place, and confirmed that the affected child A was her country to walk.
”라고 말하면서 딱 밤을 때리는 동작으로 검지 손가락으로 튕기며 피해 아동의 윗입술을 때려 아동의 정신건강 및 발달에 해를 끼치는 정서적 학대행위를 하여 아동학 대신고의무 자가 보호하는 아동에 대하여 아동 학대범죄를 범하였다.
B. On June 2016, Defendant B committed a child abuse crime against a child under the care of the victimized child by having the victimized child’s body over K(1) at K’s hand on the ground that: (a) the victimized child J (n, 1, 1, 1) brought the said I’s k (1) in the above I’s class of the child care center I class between 10:0 to 13:00 on the day on which it is impossible to identify the date; and (b) the victimized child’s k brought the said I’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’s k’
2. Summary of the Defendants’ assertion
A. Defendant A did not engage in any act as described in the facts charged, and even if such fact is recognized, it does not constitute child abuse.
B. At the time of Defendant B’s instant case, the materials Defendant B knew of the defense attitude by taking k’s hand against the same child J at the time, but there was no fact that Defendant B had the victimized child J go beyond the body under the status of K’s hand, and even if such fact is recognized, it does not constitute child abuse.
3...