Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 11, 2014, the Defendant violated the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (collective violence, deadly weapons, etc.) stated that he/she would get a customer E (the age of 22) and the victim F (the age of 23) in the D convenience store located in Pyeongtaek-si C, but he/she was unaware of the victims, he/she stated that he/she “(s) was killed, dead, and was sentenced to imprisonment, and only he/she must do so, if he/she was killed, he/she must do so,” and she takes a bath of “E froth, spath, spathy, and spathy.” After putting the face on three occasions with the main, she tried to remove the head, who is a dangerous thing in the relevant place, and put him/her away of E, but he/she tried to get the breath, cut off the breath, cut off the breath, cut off his/her face, and cut out of E.
Accordingly, the defendant, carrying dangerous articles, and assaulted victims.
2. On August 11, 2014, the Defendant engaged in the obstruction of performance of official duties, around 02:25, at the front of the above convenience point, the Defendant: (a) obstructed the Defendant’s assault; (b) obstructed the Defendant’s assault; (c) obstructed the Defendant’s use of the G police box at Pyeongtaek-gu Police Station G police station, which was called “A police officer (30 years of age) who was called out after receiving the said report No. 112 related to the said paragraph; (d) displayed the ple, and displayed the ple in the above H; and (e) stated, “A person who was going to prison in Korea, was a police officer, was a police officer, on the face of the test; and (e) assaulted H’s chest’s chest to arrest the Defendant more than once.
Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties concerning the maintenance of public security and order by police officers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each police statement of E and F;
1. A H statement;
1. CCTV images of convenience stores;
1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;
1. Article 3(1) and Article 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on the Punishment, etc. of Criminal Crimes, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act on the punishment of criminal facts;