The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment and six months) of the lower court’s sentence against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and reflects on the fact that the crime of this case was committed by the defendant by intrusion on the victims' residence, etc. over 11 times in total, the crime of this case was committed by theft of property equivalent to 4,170,000 won in total in light of the nature of the crime in light of the method and frequency of the crime. Nevertheless, there is no agreement with the victims up to the trial due to the failure of the defendant to make a serious effort for the repayment of damage. The court below already sentenced the lowest punishment among the applicable sentencing range through discretionary mitigation, and taking into account the motive and background leading up to the crime of this case, circumstances after the crime of this case, the defendant's age, character and behavior, and other various sentencing factors as shown in the records, it is not recognized that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above assertion of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.