The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for six months) that the court below sentenced against the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. Although there are favorable circumstances such as the fact that the defendant's mistake is divided into one another and reflects the defendant's wrong, each of the crimes in this case is inferior in light of the type, method, frequency, etc. of the crime, the fact that there was no agreement with the victims up to the trial. The defendant had the record of being subject to juvenile protective disposition due to the same crime, etc., and the court below already sentenced the lowest punishment among the applicable sentencing range through discretionary mitigation, and in addition, considering the motive and background leading up to each of the crimes in this case, the circumstances after the crime, and other various sentencing conditions indicated in the records, such as the defendant's age, character, conduct, and environment, it is not recognized that the sentencing of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.